Marchford logo

Up to 12 months interest free payment plans now available. Please contact us for further information.

Who Gets Paid First in a Liquidation?

If you need help or advice regarding any aspect of liquidating a limited company, we are here to help. Please feel free to contact  the Marchford team today.

Who Gets Paid First in a Liquidation?

Table of Contents

Navigating the intricacies of a company’s liquidation is more than just understanding the dissolution of a business; it’s about grasping the priorities set by legal frameworks which define who gets compensated first. 

These regulations offer a glimpse into the societal and economic values placed on different stakeholders, ensuring that certain parties are protected over others in the unfortunate event of a business’s demise.

In the UK, a set hierarchy dictates this repayment order, a structure that can be puzzling but is crucial for businesses, creditors, and employees alike. 

Delving into this hierarchy clarifies the path of asset distribution and unravels the intertwined relationships between businesses and their stakeholders, shedding light on the broader financial ecosystem. 

Join us as we journey through the layers of this hierarchy, examining the roles and ranks of various creditors and demystifying the complexities of liquidation repayment.

What Are the Categories of Creditor for Repayment During Liquidation?

Liquidation is a legally complex process, and one of its most intricate aspects is determining which creditors get paid first.

This prioritisation is essential to ensure an orderly wind-down of a company’s financial obligations.

Before diving deeper into the specific hierarchy, it’s paramount to understand the broad creditor categories that come into play during liquidation.

1. Fixed Charge Creditors

These creditors have security over a specific asset or set of assets.

In simpler terms, if a company has taken a loan by pledging specific machinery or property, the lender (or the creditor) has a fixed charge over that particular asset.

If the company fails to pay back, the creditor can sell that asset to recover the debt.

2. Floating Charge Creditors

Unlike their fixed counterparts, these creditors have a charge over frequently changing assets, like stock or cash.

The charge ‘floats’ on the current assets and can ‘crystallise’ into a fixed charge upon certain trigger events, like liquidation.

3. Preferential Creditors

This category includes specific debts the law considers a priority, such as certain employee wages or pension contributions.

As the name suggests, these creditors are ‘preferred’ over some others in the pecking order of repayment.

4. Unsecured Creditors

Creditors in this category have provided credit without any security or charge over the company’s assets.

Unfortunately, they stand in contrast to secured creditors and are lower in the repayment hierarchy.

5. Shareholders

Although not traditional ‘creditors’, shareholders are stakeholders with a financial interest in the company.

However, they are at the bottom of the repayment ladder, receiving nothing left after all other debts have been settled.

Understanding these categories is the foundation for comprehending how liquidation repayments work, ensuring clarity in a process that is otherwise fraught with uncertainty and complexity.

Related Post: How to Liquidate Your Company With No Money

Where Does HMRC Sit in the Repayment Hierarchy?

The position of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) in the repayment hierarchy has been a topic of keen interest and debate in the insolvency world.

The role and rank of HMRC in the repayment process not only reveal the state’s priorities but also have a significant bearing on the potential returns for other types of creditors.

Historically, HMRC operated primarily as an unsecured creditor.

This meant that, in the vast majority of insolvencies, HMRC would be waiting in line for repayment along with general trade creditors, suppliers, and others without a secured claim against company assets.

This position, while clear, often left HMRC receiving only a fraction of the outstanding tax owed.

However, changes were introduced in December 2020 that shifted the dynamics considerably.

HMRC was granted preferential creditor status for specific tax debts.

This includes Value Added Tax (VAT), PAYE income tax, employee National Insurance contributions, and student loan deductions.

The implication of this move is profound.

With this acquired status, HMRC now stands ahead of floating charge creditors and unsecured creditors in the queue, ensuring a better chance of recovery for the government.

Yet, it’s crucial to note that HMRC doesn’t universally hold this elevated position for all debts.

They are preferential only for certain tax categories.

HMRC remains an unsecured creditor for taxes not classified under the preferential status.

This change underscores the government’s duty and intent to safeguard its revenues.

While it’s a win for the state coffers, businesses and insolvency practitioners must re-evaluate their strategies and expectations in light of HMRC’s enhanced standing since 2020.

Related Post: Advice on Liquidating Your Limited Company with Debt

What is the Pari Passu Basis of Payment Distribution?

The concept of “pari passu” stands as one of the central pillars in insolvency proceedings, ensuring a level playing field for creditors within the same category.

The term “pari passu” hails from Latin origins, translating to “on equal footing.”

This principle has long been embedded in many jurisdictions’ legal traditions, establishing a sense of fairness and equity in the treatment of debts during events such as liquidation.

In the realm of insolvency, the pari passu principle serves as a guide for the distribution of assets.

It means that no creditor within the same category should receive an undue advantage over another.

Every creditor is treated equally in proportion to the debt owed to them.

If, for instance, a company has insufficient assets to satisfy the full claims of all its preferential creditors, the available assets are divided among them based on their respective claims, ensuring a proportionate distribution.

While the principle appears straightforward, its application can be nuanced.

For instance, when the assets of an insolvent entity are being distributed, it’s not always as simple as dividing what’s left among the creditors.

There can be multiple classes of debts, each with its hierarchy and rights.

The pari passu principle ensures that, within each class, the creditors get an equal share proportional to their claim, ensuring no intra-class discrimination.

Adhering to the pari passu principle ensures transparency and fairness in liquidation proceedings.

Maintaining a uniform distribution methodology provides a predictable framework that can help mitigate disputes and reduce potential litigation, facilitating a smoother insolvency process.

Related Post: What is the Cheapest Way to Liquidate Your Ltd Company?

What Are Preferential Creditors?

Preferential creditors represent a distinct group in the insolvency hierarchy, holding a special status due to the nature of their claims and the importance assigned to them by legislation.

Their debts are given precedence over certain other types of debt, highlighting the societal and economic significance these debts carry.

Primarily, preferential debts encompass certain employee-related liabilities.

These can include arrears of pay, holiday pay, and specific pension contributions.

When a company cannot meet all its financial obligations, the law recognises the hardship that can befall employees who might face sudden unemployment and the loss of earned wages.

By granting these debts preferential status, the legal system seeks to mitigate some of this potential hardship.

Moreover, the pivotal shift saw the elevation of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to the status of a preferential creditor, but only for certain types of tax debts.

This includes elements like Value Added Tax (VAT), PAYE income tax, and National Insurance contributions owed by employees.

Understanding the scope and significance of preferential creditors is essential for businesses and directors.

It showcases the priority given to certain societal and economic obligations and shapes the repayment expectations for other creditor categories during liquidation.

What Are Unsecured Creditors?

Unsecured creditors, as the name implies, are those entities or individuals who have extended credit to a company without any collateral or specific charge on the company’s assets.

Their claims lack the safety nets inherent to their secured counterparts, making them particularly vulnerable in insolvency scenarios.

Typically, this category encompasses a broad range of entities, including suppliers, customers, trade creditors, and even utility providers.

Often, these creditors have provided goods or services based on contractual terms or agreements, expecting payment within a set timeframe.

However, when a company faces financial difficulties or enters into liquidation, these unsecured creditors often find themselves in a precarious position.

Given their lack of security over specific assets, unsecured creditors usually stand behind fixed and floating charge creditors and preferential creditors in the repayment queue.

As a result, in many insolvency situations, they may only receive partial repayment or, in unfortunate circumstances, nothing at all.

This inherent risk makes it crucial for businesses and individuals to consider their position and potential exposure when extending unsecured credit.

What Are Floating Charge Creditors?

Floating charge creditors hold a unique position in the financial landscape of a company.

Unlike fixed charge creditors, who have a charge over specific, identifiable assets, floating charge creditors have a charge over a pool of assets that is continuously changing, such as stock, cash, or receivables.

This ‘floating’ nature provides the company with flexibility, allowing it to buy, sell, or otherwise deal with its assets in the ordinary course of business without seeking the creditor’s permission each time.

It’s only upon specific trigger events, like the onset of liquidation or breach of certain covenants, that this charge ‘crystallises’ and becomes fixed over the existing assets.

Banks and financial institutions are commonly associated with floating charges, using them as a means to secure their loans while permitting businesses the operational freedom they require.

Understanding the distinction and dynamics of floating charges is crucial for both creditors and businesses, given their potential influence on a company’s financial flexibility and insolvency outcomes.

What Are Fixed Charge Creditors?

Fixed charge creditors occupy a secured position within a company’s financial structure, having a claim over distinct, specified assets of the company.

As the name suggests, this form of security is ‘fixed’ on particular assets, which could range from land and buildings to machinery or even intellectual property.

When a company pledges an asset as security for a loan or other financial agreement, it typically cannot sell, lease, or dispose of that asset without the creditor’s consent.

This gives the creditor a high degree of protection, as the value of the secured asset acts as a safeguard against potential default by the debtor.

In the event of a company’s liquidation, fixed charge creditors are among the first in line for repayment, right after certain preferential debts.

They have the right to realise the value of the specific assets over which they hold a charge.

Given their prioritised position in repayment scenarios, lenders and investors looking to mitigate financial risks often favour fixed-charge security.

What is the Prescribed Part of Repayment During Liquidation?

The “prescribed part” is a significant component in the UK insolvency regime, designed to ensure a fairer distribution of assets among unsecured creditors during a company’s liquidation.

Recognising the challenges unsecured creditors often face in insolvency scenarios due to their lower standing in the repayment hierarchy, the government established the concept of the prescribed part to provide some level of solace to these creditors.

Derived from the proceeds of floating charge assets, the prescribed part is a portion specifically set aside for unsecured creditors.

This means that a certain percentage is earmarked exclusively for unsecured creditors before floating charge creditors receive the entirety of their due from the floating charge assets.

This mechanism ensures that unsecured creditors, who often find themselves in a vulnerable position, can expect some return from the liquidation process.

By creating this carve-out, the legal system strives for a balanced distribution, promoting a sense of fairness and equity among all creditors in an otherwise challenging financial landscape.

Related Post: What Happens During Company Liquidation in the UK?

Final Notes On Who Gets Paid First in Liquidation

While a challenging phase in a company’s lifecycle, liquidation is governed by stringent legal structures to ensure clarity, fairness, and predictability.

The payment hierarchy in liquidation is more than just a sequence; it reflects societal, economic, and legal priorities. 

Each position in the repayment hierarchy serves a purpose, from safeguarding employee rights and state revenues to ensuring lenders have confidence in the financial systems. 

Businesses and their stakeholders should familiarise themselves with these intricacies, not just as a matter of compliance but also to understand the broader implications of their financial decisions.

Liquidation, in many respects, is a litmus test of a company’s financial resilience and planning. 

Thus, understanding ‘who gets paid first’ is essential for navigating a liquidation event and shaping strategic financial choices during a company’s operational phases.

Facing challenges with company closures? 

Let Marchford guide you seamlessly through the process. As specialists in company closures, we provide expert guidance and solutions tailored to your unique circumstances. 

Trust Marchford – your partner in navigating complex company closures with confidence. 

Reach out to a member of our team today.

For free confidential advice, get in touch today.


Hannah Paull

Hannah Paull

Hannah Paull is a co-director at Marchford with over 25 years experience as a trained accountant, including lecturing the AAT Accounting Qualification. After specialising in company closures and insolvency, Hannah has, for the last 5 years helped hundreds of directors of struggling limited companies with a wide range of solutions including company closures.


Hannah Paull

Hannah Paull

Hannah Paull is a co-director at Marchford with over 25 years experience as a trained accountant, including lecturing the AAT Accounting Qualification. After specialising in company closures and insolvency, Hannah has, for the last 5 years helped hundreds of directors of struggling limited companies with a wide range of solutions including company closures.
Get free, confidential company liquidation advice today.

Enter your details and a client advisor can find you the right solution.

By submitting this form, I give Marchford permission to contact me. More information can be found in our privacy policy here